15.7 C
Paris
mardi, juin 28, 2022

Marc PIERINI: In Europe the rule of law matters.

Must read

U.S. Treasury’s Adeyemo discussed Russia sanctions implementation in Turkey visit – Reuters

"U.S. Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo traveled to Turkey this week where he discussed Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the enforcement of sanctions imposed...

«Les tensions avec les Occidentaux poussent la Russie et la Turquie à coopérer» – Le Figaro

FIGAROVOX/ENTRETIEN - "Dans le livre «Russie-Turquie. Un défi à l'Occident ?», Isabelle Facon, spécialiste de la défense russe, aborde les relations complexes entre ces deux...

Les conservateurs turcs face au monde «immoral» de la musique – Le Figaro

"Annulations et interdictions de concerts se multiplient en Turquie à un an d'élections qui pourraient mettre en danger le président Erdogan et son parti...

Une cellule iranienne visant des touristes israéliens démantelée en Turquie – Courrier International

"La collaboration entre services de renseignements turcs et israéliens aurait permis d’éviter au moins un projet d’enlèvement ou d’assassinat visant des ressortissants israéliens à...

Marc Pierini for Carnegie Europe, 3rd of December 2021

Summary:  The Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers has voted to refer the Kavala v. Turkey case to the European Court of Human Rights. By doing so, the Council of Europe upheld European values and principles, namely the rule of law.

Today, the Council of Europe released the results of its vote on a human rights case in Turkey. In October 2017, Turkish philanthropist Osman Kavala was jailed on spurious charges, acquitted of the first indictment, and immediately sent back to jail on another charge. In December 2019, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Kavala v. Turkey that he was abusively detained and should be released pending trial. Authorities in Turkey have consistently refused to abide by this obligatory judgment.

This week’s vote at the ministerial level confirmed that Turkey was in violation of the court’s 2019 ruling and gave Turkey a little over six weeks to implement the judgment or face an infringement procedure. Turkey immediately responded that further steps by the Council of Europe would mean “interference in the independent judiciary.”

The Council of Europe’s vote is a rare piece of good news in the case against Kavala. But this development is also a principled one. In disapproving Turkey’s refusal to implement the obligatory 2019 judgment in this case, the Strasbourg-based institution upheld the European Convention on Human Rights, of which Turkey is a signatory, and supported the European Court of Human Rights, of which it is a member.

The convention and the court are the two main pillars of the rule of law in Europe. If the case against Kavala in the Turkish courts had been left unattended by the Council of Europe, it would have left a deep scar in Europe’s carefully crafted rule-of-law architecture and tacitly permitted other human rights abuses across Europe. The political significance of the Council of Europe’s decision should therefore be assessed in this broader context, where the values and principles established in the aftermath of World War II are under threat across the continent.

It is also important to remember that Turkey chose to sign the convention in 1950 and to join the court in 1959. This means two things: first, a Turkish judge sits on the court, and second, Turkey must abide by the court’s judgments by virtue of Article 46 of the convention. Therefore, the alleged interference in Turkey’s judiciary is unfounded.

Only two other countries out of the forty-seven members of the Council of Europe sided with Turkey in trying to avoid an infringement procedure. The sad reality is that Turkey could have avoided such spectacular diplomatic isolation had it chosen to play by the court’s rules. The vote has nevertheless been carefully crafted to give Turkey an opportunity to implement the court’s judgment at the January 2022 hearing in the Kavala case.

Ankara may want to push back for predictable motives. They are mostly linked to domestic politics; putting up a fight may be politically convenient to some. The other side of the coin is that beginning such a tortuous journey—after leaving the Istanbul Convention on violence against women and after a drastic downgrading of rule of law in the past few years—will further isolate Turkey from Europe and the West.

As inconvenient as it might be to some in Turkey, the rule of law matters in Europe.

Marc Pierini

Pierini is a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe, where his research focuses on developments in the Middle East and Turkey from a European perspective.@MARCPIERINI1

More articles

Latest article

U.S. Treasury’s Adeyemo discussed Russia sanctions implementation in Turkey visit – Reuters

"U.S. Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo traveled to Turkey this week where he discussed Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the enforcement of sanctions imposed...

«Les tensions avec les Occidentaux poussent la Russie et la Turquie à coopérer» – Le Figaro

FIGAROVOX/ENTRETIEN - "Dans le livre «Russie-Turquie. Un défi à l'Occident ?», Isabelle Facon, spécialiste de la défense russe, aborde les relations complexes entre ces deux...

Les conservateurs turcs face au monde «immoral» de la musique – Le Figaro

"Annulations et interdictions de concerts se multiplient en Turquie à un an d'élections qui pourraient mettre en danger le président Erdogan et son parti...

Une cellule iranienne visant des touristes israéliens démantelée en Turquie – Courrier International

"La collaboration entre services de renseignements turcs et israéliens aurait permis d’éviter au moins un projet d’enlèvement ou d’assassinat visant des ressortissants israéliens à...

Marche des fiertés : près de 200 personnes arrêtées à Istanbul – Le Monde

"Depuis un spectaculaire défilé de plus de cent mille personnes à Istanbul, en 2014, les autorités turques interdisent le rassemblement, année après année, invoquant des...